I have got SS involved in my family due to DV. My husband has spent time in prison for that, and now he is out and he would like to have contact with the child.
SS got involved for obvious reasons and they have put my child on Child Protection Plan. We had Initial Conference followed by Core group conference, which seemed to go pretty well. We are separated, he moved in new place, got work, hopefully will move on with his life.
Now the SS have made a letter of expectations following the Initial conference. 1st draft was really extreme and not feasible. Something along the lines: no direct/indirect contact between mother and father. But, in real world it is impossible. Neither of us have a family around to act as a middle man. Nor there is close enough friend, as we are new to the area. No contact with child expect for contact center once every 2 weeks. Obviously, that was rejected by us.
They have made 2nd draft, which was presented to me today. It is a lot more do-able. But it still involves supervised contact only, no direct contact between us in front of the child, no turning up to family home by him. It is fine by both of us. The problem is that it states "the contract has no time limits. And we both agree to adhere to it even if Children's Services stopped their involvement in family".
I have asked what does that mean, SW said that when the next core group meetings take place, it will be reviewed and amended. I said that why it does not mention any timescales then, nor mention that it will be reviewed. Also, how can it be in place, if SS have stopped involvement (i.e.risks are significantly reduced), therefore so strict rules are not required.
Am I just being overly cautious? Signing that just felt like shooting myself in a foot. Anyway, I did not sign it, SW said that she will tell that mum is reluctant to sign the letter. I said that I am not reluctant, I am fine with the points in the letter, but I am not happy about timescale, which is basically "forever". SW said that they will not make any changes, as changes were already made to it once and that they will seek legal advice.
Have I done the right thing? or did I screw up? Scared now