If you’re not being given the CDT worker’s details, then Ask the duty manager (or the main children’s services contact who called you) to confirm in writing:
Who received the referral from the school, Which team processed it, and The name and role of the worker who recorded the children’s statements.
They must tell you this, it’s your right to know who handled information about your children. If the CDT was not actually allocated, that will become clear very quickly once they answer those questions.
S47 initiated after false allegations
-
Fatherof480
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Sat May 20, 2023 7:25 am
Re: S47 initiated after false allegations
I was able to get details of the duty team and name of the allocated worker from the previous CDT assistant who came out to the initial visit. I will be sending an email this morning.
-
Fatherof480
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Sat May 20, 2023 7:25 am
Re: S47 initiated after false allegations
Quick update. Had a call today in response to my email from the allocated CDT worker. She informed me that she is leaving the service today as her contract had expired and that someone will be in touch next week. She apologised for not contacting me sooner but claimed she "just didn't get round to doing it". When i questioned her about the change of information and that it was different from the schools version,, she tried to pass it off as the info couldve changed after the initial worker spoke to the children in which i corrected her that it was said before they even had the chance to talk to them. I have also spoken to the the vice principal at the school and put in a subject access request for the submitted report.
Re: S47 initiated after false allegations
Hi Fatherof480,
Thanks for the update. What you’ve described is exactly what happens when a Section 47 is weak and the LA are just trying to finish the process.
A few key points:
1. The CDT worker saying she “didn’t get round to it” is very telling.
If they thought your children were at real risk, she wouldn’t have ignored the case for weeks or left without doing anything. That alone shows this is a low-concern situation.
2. Her explanation about the “changed information” doesn’t add up.
You were right to correct her. The school’s version was recorded before social services spoke to your twins, so the incorrect version came from somewhere inside the system—not your children.
3. Your SAR to the school is the best thing you could have done.
Getting the exact written record of what was said will settle the facts and protect you later.
4. A new worker contacting you next week is normal.
They will read the notes, see the inconsistencies, and simply finish the assessment. Nothing here looks like escalation.
Thanks for the update. What you’ve described is exactly what happens when a Section 47 is weak and the LA are just trying to finish the process.
A few key points:
1. The CDT worker saying she “didn’t get round to it” is very telling.
If they thought your children were at real risk, she wouldn’t have ignored the case for weeks or left without doing anything. That alone shows this is a low-concern situation.
2. Her explanation about the “changed information” doesn’t add up.
You were right to correct her. The school’s version was recorded before social services spoke to your twins, so the incorrect version came from somewhere inside the system—not your children.
3. Your SAR to the school is the best thing you could have done.
Getting the exact written record of what was said will settle the facts and protect you later.
4. A new worker contacting you next week is normal.
They will read the notes, see the inconsistencies, and simply finish the assessment. Nothing here looks like escalation.
- Suzie, FRG Adviser
- Posts: 4804
- Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2011 1:57 pm
Re: S47 initiated after false allegations
Dear Fatherof480
Thank you for your further queries and updating posts. This is Suzie, Family Rights Group’s online adviser. I am sorry to hear that there has not been much progress in your children’s case. However, you have been proactive in trying to make sure that information is accurate and in trying to clarify what the children with disabilities team’s involvement is and who the allocated worker is.
The social worker has probably already been to visit your younger girls as part of their assessment. If so, I hope it went well. You were concerned that the social worker mentioned background checks on you and your wife and that they would contact the police. This is not unusual as they are trying to ensure they have an accurate picture of your family.
You were also worried about whether there was any extra preparation you needed to do for the visit because of the girls’ needs and how the social worker might interpret their presentation. You are an expert in terms of your own children’s needs so if you explained to the social worker how they present that will have been helpful. The social worker should engage with the children according to their age and understanding and should have a good awareness of how ADHD impacts children. There is no requirement for children to present in a particular way. Your willingness to allow the social worker to talk to them is the right approach.
You have had difficulties getting details about the social worker from the children with disabilities team. She has now been in touch although is leaving the department. It is unfortunate and frustrating that she could not tell you who the new social worker would be.
There has been some confusion about why the recent referral went to the children with disabilities team even though the case was closed to them since June. I may be able to clarify this. Many local authorities have a policy which states that if a new referral comes in about children whose case was closed to children’s services in the last six months – then it is passed to the team that was most recently involved. You can check if your children’s services have this policy. Once a new worker is allocated, I hope they will be able to explain more.
You have already flagged your concerns about the discrepancies in information held by school and children’s services, you are awaiting the outcome of your initial complaint to children’s services and have asked the school to share their report with you (and have formally put in a subject access request) so you have already done a lot. You should hear back from children’s services’ complaints department soon but if not then do chase that up as they must let you know if they are unable to respond to you in the required timescale.
I hope the social worker answers the questions we discussed previously and that they can let you know the status and completion date of their assessment including when they will share a copy and their recommendations with you. Receiving the assessment and then going through it carefully is the key to understanding what information was shared and gathered and by whom. You will then be in a better position to respond to concerns you have about the accuracy of information. If the assessment concludes that there are no child protection concerns, then any plan of support offered to you is voluntary. I hope that children’s services update you as soon as possible.
Please call the confidential freephone advice line if you would find it helpful to discuss the situation with an experienced adviser. The number is 0808 8010366 and the lines are open from 9.30 am to 3.00 pm, Mon to Fri (except bank holidays). Of course, please post back if you prefer.
I hope this helps.
Best wishes
Suzie
Thank you for your further queries and updating posts. This is Suzie, Family Rights Group’s online adviser. I am sorry to hear that there has not been much progress in your children’s case. However, you have been proactive in trying to make sure that information is accurate and in trying to clarify what the children with disabilities team’s involvement is and who the allocated worker is.
The social worker has probably already been to visit your younger girls as part of their assessment. If so, I hope it went well. You were concerned that the social worker mentioned background checks on you and your wife and that they would contact the police. This is not unusual as they are trying to ensure they have an accurate picture of your family.
You were also worried about whether there was any extra preparation you needed to do for the visit because of the girls’ needs and how the social worker might interpret their presentation. You are an expert in terms of your own children’s needs so if you explained to the social worker how they present that will have been helpful. The social worker should engage with the children according to their age and understanding and should have a good awareness of how ADHD impacts children. There is no requirement for children to present in a particular way. Your willingness to allow the social worker to talk to them is the right approach.
You have had difficulties getting details about the social worker from the children with disabilities team. She has now been in touch although is leaving the department. It is unfortunate and frustrating that she could not tell you who the new social worker would be.
There has been some confusion about why the recent referral went to the children with disabilities team even though the case was closed to them since June. I may be able to clarify this. Many local authorities have a policy which states that if a new referral comes in about children whose case was closed to children’s services in the last six months – then it is passed to the team that was most recently involved. You can check if your children’s services have this policy. Once a new worker is allocated, I hope they will be able to explain more.
You have already flagged your concerns about the discrepancies in information held by school and children’s services, you are awaiting the outcome of your initial complaint to children’s services and have asked the school to share their report with you (and have formally put in a subject access request) so you have already done a lot. You should hear back from children’s services’ complaints department soon but if not then do chase that up as they must let you know if they are unable to respond to you in the required timescale.
I hope the social worker answers the questions we discussed previously and that they can let you know the status and completion date of their assessment including when they will share a copy and their recommendations with you. Receiving the assessment and then going through it carefully is the key to understanding what information was shared and gathered and by whom. You will then be in a better position to respond to concerns you have about the accuracy of information. If the assessment concludes that there are no child protection concerns, then any plan of support offered to you is voluntary. I hope that children’s services update you as soon as possible.
Please call the confidential freephone advice line if you would find it helpful to discuss the situation with an experienced adviser. The number is 0808 8010366 and the lines are open from 9.30 am to 3.00 pm, Mon to Fri (except bank holidays). Of course, please post back if you prefer.
I hope this helps.
Best wishes
Suzie
Do you have 3 minutes to complete our evaluation form ? We would value your feedback on the parents’ forum.
Who is online
In total there are 4 users online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 4 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 72 on Tue Dec 09, 2025 7:09 pm