How to contact us for advice

Find out more

Telephone Handler
Close form

Our advice service

Are you a parent, kinship carer relative or friend of a child who is involved with, or who needs the help of, children’s services in England? We can help you understand processes and options when social workers or courts are making decisions about your child’s welfare.

Our advice service is free, independent and confidential.

Telephone Handler

By phone or email

To speak to an adviser, please call our free and confidential advice line 0808 801 0366 (Monday to Friday 9.30am to 3pm, excluding Bank Holidays). Or you can ask us a question via email using our advice enquiry form.

Discuss on our forums

Our online advice forums are an anonymous space where parents and kinship carers (also known as family and friends carers) can get legal and practical advice, build a support network and learn from other people’s experiences.

Advice on our website

Our get help and advice section has template letters, advice sheets and resources about legal and social care processes. On Monday and Thursday afternoons, you can use our webchat service to chat online to an adviser.

 

Exit
Family Rights Group
Cover Your Tracks

Baby Victoria: National review calls for urgent action

Published: 16th February 2026

4 minute read

Family Rights Group welcomes recommendations from the Child Safeguarding Practice Review Panel’s report into the death of baby Victoria Marten.

The review found that serious and compounding risks, such as breakdown of engagement between parents and practitioners, domestic abuse, and moves between areas are often known to agencies but not consistently assessed and managed together, resulting in reduced opportunities for safeguarding.

Trauma-informed approach

The review concludes that protecting unborn and highly vulnerable infants requires a trauma informed, multi agency approach with stronger pre birth safeguarding, clearer national guidance, improved information sharing, recognition of the impact of previous child removal, and better engagement and support for parents after child removal.

Clear national guidance

It calls for clearer national guidance to ensure vulnerable unborn babies and infants are consistently considered within child protection frameworks.
It warns that without stronger coordination, opportunities to protect vulnerable unborn babies and infants can be missed.

Joint statement

Together with Research in Practice and other organisations working to innovate practice with parents, Family Rights Group has signed a joint statement, welcoming the recommendations.

Our group statement

“We welcome the recommendations from the Child Safeguarding Practice Review Panel’s report into the death of Baby Victoria. In particular, calling for a stronger focus on trauma-informed practice when working with parents with children’s social care involvement in their lives, more effective implementation of pre-birth protocols and for the development of parent support plans when parents are no longer able to care for their children.

A decade of high-quality research makes evident that recurrent care proceedings are a significant issue across England and Wales. We recognise the urgent need for coordinated, specialised, sustained, and compassionate trauma-informed support for parents before, during, and after care proceedings. We consider these recommendations to be vital steps forward and we would like to see them strengthened further.

It is excellent to see the report call on Government to strengthen national guidance. However, we think that this should go further and for long-term, relational support to be available in every local authority for parents in these situations. However, the requirement for sustained, multi-agency support to parents who experience recurrent care proceedings cannot be resourced solely or primarily through already stretched local authority children’s social care budgets. This will require long term, dedicated funding arrangements that enable meaningful support. There are moral, ethical and cost benefit imperatives to this, with clear evidence of significant cost savings to children’s social care and wider public services (Boddy et al., 2020).

We have been working collaboratively to advocate for and improve support for parents experiencing repeat removals. The Community of Practice we support involves 75 organisations across all regions of England and is the repository of deep practice expertise that should be utilised in planning for the implementation of these recommendations. Their work demonstrates that timely, relationship-based, trauma-informed support can help parents stabilise, recover and make the changes needed to enable them to keep or be reunified with their child.

Where this is not possible, sustained relationship-based trauma-informed support, which responds to long-standing unmet health and welfare needs and recognises the trauma of previous child separations, remains essential in helping parents to make lasting positive changes and build more positive futures for themselves. This is particularly important for the significant proportion of parents who were themselves in care as children – understood to represent around 40% of mothers experiencing recurrent care proceedings (Broadhurst et al., 2017) – where the state carries a moral and ethical responsibility as corporate parent and grandparent. Providing this support can strengthen parents’ chances of maintaining relationships with children they are separated from, keep open the possibility of reunification in the future, and reduce the risk of further care proceedings, including by preventing the recurrence of removals for subsequent children and supporting better outcomes for those children.

We are committed to supporting parents with compassionate and trauma-informed responses that make lasting changes and build more stable, hopeful futures for themselves and their families, whether or not they are able to care for their children themselves.”

Signatories

  • Susannah Bowyer, Deputy Director for Children and Families, Research in Practice
  • Kate Tilley, Director of Partnerships and Engagement, Pause
  • Pam Ledward, Director for Social Care Practice, Family Rights Group
  • Lisa Harker, Director, Nuffield Family Justice Observatory
  • Kirsty Kitchen, Director of the Birth Companions, Birth Companions
  • Kaat De Backer, Midwife Research Fellow, King’s College London
  • Dr Danny Taggart, Programme Director in psychology at University of Essex

References

  • Boddy, J., Bower, S., Godar, R., Hale, C., Kearney, J., Preston, O., Wheeler, B., & Wilkinson, J. (2020). Evaluation of Pause. Department for Education.
  • Broadhurst, K., Mason, C., Bedston, S., Alrouh, B., Morriss, L., McQuarrie, T., Palmer, M., Shaw, M., Harwin, J., & Kershaw, S. (2017). Vulnerable birth mothers and recurrent care proceedings. University of Lancaster.
People pie chart

Our funding means we can currently only help 4 in 10 people

Your donation will help more families access expert legal advice and support from Family Rights Group.

Donate Now